<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Open Registration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook: a case study of Web success &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook: a case study of Web success &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>[...] others with a .edu address. The company has since lifted that restriction, which has drawn some criticism from those who thought it should have stuck to its original pla [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] others with a .edu address. The company has since lifted that restriction, which has drawn some criticism from those who thought it should have stuck to its original pla [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewteman.org/blog/2006/09/26/facebook-open-registration/#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>I find this to be a silly move on Facebook's behalf too. Especially in regards to revenue. By having an audience that is nothing but mysoginists,alcoholics and Dane Cook fans, the advertising scope was limited, but could allow for a great amount of saturation on behalf of the companies and people behind this flood of bad culture. Now every Dick and Jane can have a profile, and the people behind collegehumor.com, and the 'bros' responsible for the text ads for Frat parties will have to find some other lame forum to get their message out.

Also, with their rumored buyout by Yahoo of Facebook, I fear that Flickr might become a wasteland of party pictures (more so than it kinda is already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this to be a silly move on Facebook&#8217;s behalf too. Especially in regards to revenue. By having an audience that is nothing but mysoginists,alcoholics and Dane Cook fans, the advertising scope was limited, but could allow for a great amount of saturation on behalf of the companies and people behind this flood of bad culture. Now every Dick and Jane can have a profile, and the people behind collegehumor.com, and the &#8216;bros&#8217; responsible for the text ads for Frat parties will have to find some other lame forum to get their message out.</p>
<p>Also, with their rumored buyout by Yahoo of Facebook, I fear that Flickr might become a wasteland of party pictures (more so than it kinda is already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
